<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Network Solutions holding domains to ransom</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.preshweb.co.uk/2008/01/network-solutions-holding-domains-to-ransom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.preshweb.co.uk/2008/01/network-solutions-holding-domains-to-ransom/</link>
	<description>David Precious - professional Perl developer, motorcyclist and beer drinker</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 12:39:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3-aortic-dissection</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tai Slim</title>
		<link>http://www.preshweb.co.uk/2008/01/network-solutions-holding-domains-to-ransom/comment-page-1/#comment-40497</link>
		<dc:creator>Tai Slim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 05:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.preshweb.co.uk/2008/01/network-solutions-holding-domains-to-ransom/#comment-40497</guid>
		<description>International community such as WWW Org and ICANN should do something to control such registration scams. Such thing make internet ugly. Network Solution&#039;s wrong practice must be abandoned.

Recently I got an email from a chinese registrar the some company has applied for a simillar domain name which resembles my business. They enlisted several simillar domains which I should register. I suppose this is also a scam to register more domains.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>International community such as WWW Org and ICANN should do something to control such registration scams. Such thing make internet ugly. Network Solution&#8217;s wrong practice must be abandoned.</p>
<p>Recently I got an email from a chinese registrar the some company has applied for a simillar domain name which resembles my business. They enlisted several simillar domains which I should register. I suppose this is also a scam to register more domains.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek</title>
		<link>http://www.preshweb.co.uk/2008/01/network-solutions-holding-domains-to-ransom/comment-page-1/#comment-17154</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 12:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.preshweb.co.uk/2008/01/network-solutions-holding-domains-to-ransom/#comment-17154</guid>
		<description>Very informative article, thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very informative article, thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon</title>
		<link>http://www.preshweb.co.uk/2008/01/network-solutions-holding-domains-to-ransom/comment-page-1/#comment-16229</link>
		<dc:creator>jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 07:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.preshweb.co.uk/2008/01/network-solutions-holding-domains-to-ransom/#comment-16229</guid>
		<description>wow! great article. thanks for sharing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow! great article. thanks for sharing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Network Solutions (NetSol) ransom at Ambrand Dot Com</title>
		<link>http://www.preshweb.co.uk/2008/01/network-solutions-holding-domains-to-ransom/comment-page-1/#comment-14263</link>
		<dc:creator>Network Solutions (NetSol) ransom at Ambrand Dot Com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 01:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.preshweb.co.uk/2008/01/network-solutions-holding-domains-to-ransom/#comment-14263</guid>
		<description>[...] to www.networksolutions.com and check if a random domain is available (I tried f5ke00gpl.com and it was). Sit back for 5 minutes. Then do a WHOIS using your [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to <a href="http://www.networksolutions.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.networksolutions.com</a> and check if a random domain is available (I tried f5ke00gpl.com and it was). Sit back for 5 minutes. Then do a WHOIS using your [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malcolm Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.preshweb.co.uk/2008/01/network-solutions-holding-domains-to-ransom/comment-page-1/#comment-11844</link>
		<dc:creator>Malcolm Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 22:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.preshweb.co.uk/2008/01/network-solutions-holding-domains-to-ransom/#comment-11844</guid>
		<description>Yes, I saw the /. article, and particularly enjoyed this comment:

http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=410854&amp;cid=21958492

(Interestingly, and perhaps as a reaction to the above post(s), they&#039;ve changed their domain-squatting page that used to feature a smug blond-haired blue-eyed guy to a simple &quot;website under construction page&quot;.)

I tried it myself, and then at this month&#039;s HertsLUG meeting gave a demonstration with a randomly-picked domain shouted from the floor:

http://www.networksolutionsstealthis.com

This was originally freely available (although someone had beaten us to the .co.uk and .de variants ;-) But after about a minute, they&#039;d sat on it.

Their CEO (who apparently likes goatse) gave a response claiming that they were protecting their customers. Yeah right, without telling anyone.

I doubt there is much that can be done. It doesn&#039;t cost them anything, so they will keep doing it. Hopefully their company&#039;s reputation is now worth 0.02c.

I think we need a separate interweb for such lamers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I saw the /. article, and particularly enjoyed this comment:</p>
<p><a href="http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=410854&#038;cid=21958492" rel="nofollow">http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=410854&#038;cid=21958492</a></p>
<p>(Interestingly, and perhaps as a reaction to the above post(s), they&#8217;ve changed their domain-squatting page that used to feature a smug blond-haired blue-eyed guy to a simple &#8220;website under construction page&#8221;.)</p>
<p>I tried it myself, and then at this month&#8217;s HertsLUG meeting gave a demonstration with a randomly-picked domain shouted from the floor:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.networksolutionsstealthis.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.networksolutionsstealthis.com</a></p>
<p>This was originally freely available (although someone had beaten us to the .co.uk and .de variants ;-) But after about a minute, they&#8217;d sat on it.</p>
<p>Their CEO (who apparently likes goatse) gave a response claiming that they were protecting their customers. Yeah right, without telling anyone.</p>
<p>I doubt there is much that can be done. It doesn&#8217;t cost them anything, so they will keep doing it. Hopefully their company&#8217;s reputation is now worth 0.02c.</p>
<p>I think we need a separate interweb for such lamers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigpresh</title>
		<link>http://www.preshweb.co.uk/2008/01/network-solutions-holding-domains-to-ransom/comment-page-1/#comment-11803</link>
		<dc:creator>bigpresh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 09:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.preshweb.co.uk/2008/01/network-solutions-holding-domains-to-ransom/#comment-11803</guid>
		<description>@Sam:

Of course - but that&#039;s 4 days too long, and, as you commented on the other post, when the domain drops there&#039;s a good chance that the bottom-feeders of the domain market will immediately snap it up, so if the original user who searched for it waits for NS to drop it, they&#039;ll probably not be able to register it anyway.

ICANN recently appealed for reports of domain front-running, so I sent them a report of NS&#039;s behaviour last night - I doubt they&#039;ll have the cojones to do anything, but still.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Sam:</p>
<p>Of course &#8211; but that&#8217;s 4 days too long, and, as you commented on the other post, when the domain drops there&#8217;s a good chance that the bottom-feeders of the domain market will immediately snap it up, so if the original user who searched for it waits for NS to drop it, they&#8217;ll probably not be able to register it anyway.</p>
<p>ICANN recently appealed for reports of domain front-running, so I sent them a report of NS&#8217;s behaviour last night &#8211; I doubt they&#8217;ll have the cojones to do anything, but still.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Kington</title>
		<link>http://www.preshweb.co.uk/2008/01/network-solutions-holding-domains-to-ransom/comment-page-1/#comment-11786</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Kington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 03:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.preshweb.co.uk/2008/01/network-solutions-holding-domains-to-ransom/#comment-11786</guid>
		<description>They&#039;ll only own these domains for 4 days, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;ll only own these domains for 4 days, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigpresh</title>
		<link>http://www.preshweb.co.uk/2008/01/network-solutions-holding-domains-to-ransom/comment-page-1/#comment-11765</link>
		<dc:creator>bigpresh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.preshweb.co.uk/2008/01/network-solutions-holding-domains-to-ransom/#comment-11765</guid>
		<description>Oh, and if ICANN aren&#039;t annoyed enough by these tactics, I&#039;m sure they won&#039;t like the fact that Network Solutions are the proud owners of &lt;a href=&quot;http://icann-can-lick-our-butthole.com/&quot;&gt;icann-can-lick-our-butthole.com&lt;/a&gt;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and if ICANN aren&#8217;t annoyed enough by these tactics, I&#8217;m sure they won&#8217;t like the fact that Network Solutions are the proud owners of <a href="http://icann-can-lick-our-butthole.com/">icann-can-lick-our-butthole.com</a>!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigpresh</title>
		<link>http://www.preshweb.co.uk/2008/01/network-solutions-holding-domains-to-ransom/comment-page-1/#comment-11764</link>
		<dc:creator>bigpresh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.preshweb.co.uk/2008/01/network-solutions-holding-domains-to-ransom/#comment-11764</guid>
		<description>And the folks at Slashdot have got them to register lots of controversial domains, including &lt;a href=&quot;http://network-solutions-supports-terrorism.com/&quot;&gt;network-solutions-supports-terrorism.com&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://osama-bin-laden-is-hiding-at-network-solutions.com/&quot;&gt;osama-bin-laden-is-hiding-at-network-solutions.com&lt;/a&gt;,  &lt;a href=&quot;http://george-bush-should-be-assasinated.com/&quot;&gt;george-bush-should-be-assasinated.com&lt;/a&gt; (nice spelling though), and even stuff that might get them in trouble for registering domains containing trademarks like &lt;a href=&quot;http://authenticdisneymerchandise.com/&quot;&gt;authenticdisneymerchandise.com&lt;/a&gt;. 

I&#039;d love to know how many domains they&#039;ve snapped up since everyone reading the &lt;a href=&quot;http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/01/08/1920215&quot;&gt;Slashdot article about this&lt;/a&gt; got involved.

It does seem as though they&#039;ve stopped snaffling domains I&#039;ve searched for though... either they&#039;ll only do so many per IP, or they&#039;ve disabled it now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the folks at Slashdot have got them to register lots of controversial domains, including <a href="http://network-solutions-supports-terrorism.com/">network-solutions-supports-terrorism.com</a>, <a href="http://osama-bin-laden-is-hiding-at-network-solutions.com/">osama-bin-laden-is-hiding-at-network-solutions.com</a>,  <a href="http://george-bush-should-be-assasinated.com/">george-bush-should-be-assasinated.com</a> (nice spelling though), and even stuff that might get them in trouble for registering domains containing trademarks like <a href="http://authenticdisneymerchandise.com/">authenticdisneymerchandise.com</a>. </p>
<p>I&#8217;d love to know how many domains they&#8217;ve snapped up since everyone reading the <a href="http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/01/08/1920215">Slashdot article about this</a> got involved.</p>
<p>It does seem as though they&#8217;ve stopped snaffling domains I&#8217;ve searched for though&#8230; either they&#8217;ll only do so many per IP, or they&#8217;ve disabled it now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigpresh</title>
		<link>http://www.preshweb.co.uk/2008/01/network-solutions-holding-domains-to-ransom/comment-page-1/#comment-11762</link>
		<dc:creator>bigpresh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 20:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.preshweb.co.uk/2008/01/network-solutions-holding-domains-to-ransom/#comment-11762</guid>
		<description>They do it not only for domains checked via their website, but also for ones checked on their whois server.

I verified with:

&lt;code&gt;
whois -h whois.networksolutions.com stop-stealing-domain-names-you-bastards.com
&lt;/code&gt;

Sure enough, a few minutes later, they&#039;d registered it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They do it not only for domains checked via their website, but also for ones checked on their whois server.</p>
<p>I verified with:</p>
<p><code><br />
whois -h whois.networksolutions.com stop-stealing-domain-names-you-bastards.com<br />
</code></p>
<p>Sure enough, a few minutes later, they&#8217;d registered it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

